Keep Your Funds
Safe From Here On
Safeheron offers enterprise-grade digital asset self-custody services and MPC privatization solutions, ensuring the highest level of security for your assets.
Secure, Efficient, Scalable
Top-tier, battle-tested security solutions for 260+ institutions since 2021.
RAISED
PEAK AUC
SECURELY TRANSFERRED
Committed to the highest standards of security and compliance.
Certified and Insured
Partner with Top Security and Compliance Partners
Compliance in Action
Explore Our Trust Center
MPC Self-Custody
Enterprise-grade digital asset self-custody services
Eliminate single-point failures to manage digital assets
- MPC and TEE technologies protect your digital assets with the highest level of security.
- Manage wallets and transfer funds on multiple terminals, including the mobile App and Web Console.
- Policy Engine flexibly controls access authorization.
- Off-chain multisignature enhances approval privacy and significantly reduces on-chain transaction fees.
Interact with dApps under multi-party control
- Supports all public EVM-compatible blockchains and DeFi protocols.
- Policy Engine meticulously delegates transaction permissions.
- Real-time contract monitoring and phishing detection safeguard every transaction.
- Customize RPC nodes for diverse business scenarios.
- Collaboratively manage smart contract owner’s permissions to reduce single-point risk in critical operations.
Enterprise-grade digital asset self-custody services
- Seamlessly create and manage millions of MPC wallets with APIs.
- Automatic gas fuelling and sweeping significantly improve integration efficiency and accelerate your business success.
- Web3 API securely controls the entire lifecycle of smart contracts.
- API Co-Signer automates transaction approval and signing.
- MPC and TEE technologies provide multi-layer security to eliminate single-point-of-failure risk for private keys.
MPC Node Suite
White-label MPC privatization solutions
Flexibly build MPC wallets for seamless integration into your applications
- Fully privatized, with hardware-level data security and privacy protection under your control.
- A secure, universal, and cross-platform MPC-TSS key management solution.
- Support diverse business scenarios to accelerate your success.
Safest software is
open source
Safeheron independently developed MPC algorithms and is now the world's first company to open-source the mainstream MPC-TSS algorithm in C++.
Why choose us?
100% control over assets
3-of-3 MPC-TSS key management eliminates the single-point failures with full asset control.
Open-source algorithms
Safeheron open-sourced the world's first MPC-TSS algorithm library implemented in C++.
Maximum security
Safeheron’s multi-layer security defenses against state-level attacks.
Certified and insured
Safeheron is certified with ISO/IEC 27001:2022 and SOC 2 and is insured by Lockton.
Extensive features
Safeheron offers one-stop management for Web3, DeFi, NFTs, and smart contracts.
Governance and policy
TEE Policy Engine customizes multi-dimensional policies and approval workflows.
Technical support
Robust technical support encompasses use cases, solutions, technologies, and security expertise.
Diversified solutions
Battle-tested SaaS services and MPC privatization solutions.
Hear from our customers
Our partnership with Safeheron has unlocked new possibilities in digital payment through advanced MPC and TEE technology. This collaboration strengthens our security, scalability, and compliance, enabling us to meet the highest standards. With Safeheron’s powerful MPC self-custody solution, dtcpay continues to provide our users with institutional-grade security, seamless transactions, and an intuitive user experience, reinforcing our commitment to advancing the future of digital payments.
As a trusted financial service provider, we have strict standards when choosing our security infrastructure provider. Safeheron turns out to be a great match. Its MPC self-custody solution eliminates private key risks while providing enterprise-grade security with ease of use. With Safeheron’s sophisticated technology, we are confident to provide our customers with a reliable and secure digital payment experience.
The Safeheron team has in-depth expertise and extensive practical experience in blockchain security. With a highly robust security mechanism, a comprehensive permission management system, and an excellent user experience, Safeheron has provided strong support for our institutional trading services in the Asia region. We look forward to further deepening our collaboration.
UXUY has developed a highly secure key management service powered by Safeheron's MPC technology. In today's challenging cyber environment where digital assets face numerous security threats, Safeheron's mature solution provides us with robust technical assurance. Through this innovative MPC solution, we have effectively reduced the risks of private key leakage and asset theft, delivering users a seamless experience that combines both security and convenience.
With Safeheron’s hardcore MPC technology, we ensure the highest level of security for our clients' crypto funds within our crypto-to-fiat feature. In addition, Safeheron's customer support exemplifies excellence, promptly resolving issues to maintain our uninterrupted operations.
Latest Updates from Safeheron
Institutional Wallet for Tokenized Real-World Assets: A Practical Guide
Tokenized real-world assets use blockchain tokens to record interests connected to funds, bonds, private credit, real estate, or other off-chain assets. These products are often called RWAs. For an institution, holding an RWA is not simply a matter of placing a token in a wallet. The wallet may need to receive a restricted token, pay stablecoins, collect income, process redemption, or control sensitive functions such as freezing and contract administration. An institutional wallet for tokenized real-world assets must protect signing authority, enforce team approval, and connect each blockchain action with investment documents, ownership records, and accounting data. Does the Wallet Control the Token or the Real Asset? A wallet directly controls a blockchain address and its signing authority. It can prove that an address received a token and authorize a transfer or smart contract call. The wallet alone usually cannot explain: Those answers come from the issuance structure, governing documents, registry, and applicable rules. An institution should understand the asset before it focuses on the token symbol and wallet balance. Why Is a Personal Wallet Not Enough? A personal wallet is normally controlled by one key holder. Institutional assets require separated authority, review, evidence, and continuity when staff change. Need Personal wallet Institutional RWA wallet Control One key holder Multiple roles and distributed signing Approval Holder decides alone Rules based […]
RWA On-Chain Settlement Infrastructure: How Atomic Settlement Removes the T+2 Risk Window
When someone buys a bond or a stock the traditional way, the trade doesn’t actually finish right away. There’s usually a one- or two-business-day gap between agreeing to the trade and the asset and the money actually changing hands — this is called T+1 or T+2 settlement. During that gap, both sides are exposed to the risk that the other side won’t actually deliver. Most of the time nothing goes wrong. But when something does go wrong at scale — the 2008 collapse of Lehman Brothers, or the stress in the Treasury market in 2020 — that settlement gap is exactly where the damage happens. Firms have to lock up huge amounts of capital as a cushion against this risk. When the U.S. market shortened its settlement cycle from two days to one, daily margin requirements dropped by nearly $4 billion — money that had been sitting idle purely to cover a risk window that shrank. What is “atomic settlement” Tokenizing a real-world asset — a treasury bond, a share, a private credit position — opens the door to closing that gap almost entirely. The idea is called atomic settlement: the asset moving to the buyer and the payment moving to the seller are locked together into one single commitment. Either both happen at the same instant, or neither happens […]
Crypto Wallet Infrastructure for Commodity Tokenization: Keeping the Token and the Physical Asset in Sync
A tokenized commodity has two records, and both have to stay true at the same time A tokenized gold or oil token is really two things pretending to be one. There’s the token itself, moving on a blockchain in seconds. And there’s the actual physical commodity — a gold bar in a vault, a barrel of oil in a tank — sitting with a warehouse or a trustee somewhere in the real world, where nothing moves in seconds. If those two records ever drift apart — if the token supply says more exists than is actually sitting in the vault — investor trust breaks fast, and it usually breaks all at once, not gradually. The whole job of wallet infrastructure for commodity tokenization is keeping those two records honest against each other, all the time, not just when someone asks. The 1:1 rule: one token, one specific unit of a real thing The standard most commodity tokens are built on is simple to say and hard to enforce: one token equals one unit of the actual physical asset, held in reserve. For gold, that typically means one token equals one troy ounce, and the strongest versions of this go further — “allocated” storage, where a specific token is tied to a specific, serial-numbered bar, not just a share of a […]
Wallet API for Asset Tokenization Platform: From Issuance to Redemption
Asset tokenization creates blockchain tokens linked to assets such as fund interests, bonds, real estate rights, or private credit. An investor may see a simple account screen, but the platform behind it must create addresses, receive funds, mint tokens, deliver them, distribute proceeds, and process redemptions. A wallet API connects these events to the blockchain. It lets software create wallets, retrieve addresses, request signatures, send assets, and monitor transaction status without requiring an operator to handle every action manually. However, a wallet API is not a complete tokenization platform. It does not define the legal rights represented by a token. It also does not replace investor verification, the official ownership register, accounting, banking, or regulatory reporting. A good architecture begins with this boundary. What Does the Wallet API Actually Do? Tokenization depends on several connected systems. System layer Main responsibility Wallet API role Investor portal Onboarding, holdings, subscription and redemption requests Calls wallet services but is not part of the wallet Identity and compliance KYC, eligibility, sanctions and address checks Separate service and decision process Token contract Mint, burn, pause and transfer rules Wallet signs authorized contract actions Wallet and signing Addresses, keys, approval, signatures and broadcast Core wallet API responsibility Fiat and internal ledger Bank payments, receivables and customer balances Separate source of business records Chain monitoring Confirmations, events […]
How to Control Trader Permissions on DeFi Wallets: A Practical Setup Guide
Start with three basic roles, not one big shared key Most teams that get into trouble with a shared DeFi wallet start with everyone having the same level of access — one shared key, or a wallet where any signer can do anything. A safer starting point is to split access into three separate roles. A proposer can put together a transaction and send it forward, but can’t approve it or make it happen on their own. An approver (sometimes called a voter) can review a proposed transaction and vote yes or no, but can’t create one from scratch or push it through alone. An executor can actually make an approved transaction happen on-chain, once it has enough approvals — but only after that, not before. No single person should hold all three by default. A trader who can propose, approve, and execute on their own is really just a single point of failure wearing three different hats. Match the approval threshold to how much money is moving Not every transaction needs the same level of sign-off. A small trade a trader makes several times a day shouldn’t need the same approvals as moving a large chunk of the firm’s capital. A workable pattern most teams use: smaller, routine transactions need just two out of three approvals from the operational […]
