Keep Your Funds
Safe From Here On
Safeheron offers enterprise-grade digital asset self-custody services and MPC privatization solutions, ensuring the highest level of security for your assets.
Secure, Efficient, Scalable
Top-tier, battle-tested security solutions for 250+ institutions since 2021.
RAISED
PEAK AUC
SECURELY TRANSFERRED
MPC Self-Custody
Enterprise-grade digital asset self-custody services
Eliminate single-point failures to manage digital assets
- MPC and TEE technologies protect your digital assets with the highest level of security.
- Manage wallets and transfer funds on multiple terminals, including the mobile App and Web Console.
- Policy Engine flexibly controls access authorization.
- Off-chain multisignature enhances approval privacy and significantly reduces on-chain transaction fees.
Interact with dApps under multi-party control
- Supports all public EVM-compatible blockchains and DeFi protocols.
- Policy Engine meticulously delegates transaction permissions.
- Real-time contract monitoring and phishing detection safeguard every transaction.
- Customize RPC nodes for diverse business scenarios.
- Collaboratively manage smart contract owner’s permissions to reduce single-point risk in critical operations.
Enterprise-grade digital asset self-custody services
- Seamlessly create and manage millions of MPC wallets with APIs.
- Automatic gas fuelling and sweeping significantly improve integration efficiency and accelerate your business success.
- Web3 API securely controls the entire lifecycle of smart contracts.
- API Co-Signer automates transaction approval and signing.
- MPC and TEE technologies provide multi-layer security to eliminate single-point-of-failure risk for private keys.
MPC Node Suite
White-label MPC privatization solutions
Flexibly build MPC wallets for seamless integration into your applications
- Fully privatized, with hardware-level data security and privacy protection under your control.
- A secure, universal, and cross-platform MPC-TSS key management solution.
- Support diverse business scenarios to accelerate your success.
Safest software is
open source
Safeheron independently developed MPC algorithms and is now the world's first company to open-source the mainstream MPC-TSS algorithm in C++.
Why choose us?
100% control over assets
3-of-3 MPC-TSS key management eliminates the single-point failures with full asset control.
Open-source algorithms
Safeheron open-sourced the world's first MPC-TSS algorithm library implemented in C++.
Maximum security
Safeheron’s multi-layer security defenses against state-level attacks.
Certified and insured
Safeheron is certified with ISO/IEC 27001:2022 and SOC 2 and is insured by Lockton.
Extensive features
Safeheron offers one-stop management for Web3, DeFi, NFTs, and smart contracts.
Governance and policy
TEE Policy Engine customizes multi-dimensional policies and approval workflows.
Technical support
Robust technical support encompasses use cases, solutions, technologies, and security expertise.
Diversified solutions
Battle-tested SaaS services and MPC privatization solutions.
Hear from our customers
Our partnership with Safeheron has unlocked new possibilities in digital payment through advanced MPC and TEE technology. This collaboration strengthens our security, scalability, and compliance, enabling us to meet the highest standards. With Safeheron’s powerful MPC self-custody solution, dtcpay continues to provide our users with institutional-grade security, seamless transactions, and an intuitive user experience, reinforcing our commitment to advancing the future of digital payments.
As a trusted financial service provider, we have strict standards when choosing our security infrastructure provider. Safeheron turns out to be a great match. Its MPC self-custody solution eliminates private key risks while providing enterprise-grade security with ease of use. With Safeheron’s sophisticated technology, we are confident to provide our customers with a reliable and secure digital payment experience.
Our partnership with Safeheron leverages innovative MPC and TEE technology across diverse exchange scenarios, achieving a perfect integration of uncompromising security and user-friendly experience. Together, we strive to providing users a seamless and trusted trading experience.
The Safeheron team has in-depth expertise and extensive practical experience in blockchain security. With a highly robust security mechanism, a comprehensive permission management system, and an excellent user experience, Safeheron has provided strong support for our institutional trading services in the Asia region. We look forward to further deepening our collaboration.
UXUY has developed a highly secure key management service powered by Safeheron's MPC technology. In today's challenging cyber environment where digital assets face numerous security threats, Safeheron's mature solution provides us with robust technical assurance. Through this innovative MPC solution, we have effectively reduced the risks of private key leakage and asset theft, delivering users a seamless experience that combines both security and convenience.
With Safeheron’s hardcore MPC technology, we ensure the highest level of security for our clients' crypto funds within our crypto-to-fiat feature. In addition, Safeheron's customer support exemplifies excellence, promptly resolving issues to maintain our uninterrupted operations.
Latest Updates from Safeheron
Etana Clients Lost 70%: The Real Failure Was the Absence ofInstitutional Asset Sovereignty
Written for risk, treasury, and compliance leaders at institutions holding digital assets. A Failure at the Highest Standard of Compliance On May 4, 2026, Payward, the parent company of Kraken, filed a second amended complaint suing its former custody partner Etana, alleging the misappropriation of $25 million in client assets. Etana was not an unlicensed operation. It held a trust company charter issued by the Colorado Division of Banking and had been a regulated “qualified custodian” since 2021, meaning registered investment advisers could legally entrust client assets to it. Etana positioned itself for four years around the marketing line “regulated global digital asset custodian.” When the firm received its charter, its CEO said it brought “peace of mind to clients.” The latest disclosure from the receiver: Etana has 6.83 million in cash against 26 million in liabilities. The nominal recovery ceiling for clients is roughly 26%. At least 70% of client assets, on paper, are gone. The Real Cost: Not 70% of the Money, but 100% of the Control For institutional clients caught in something like Etana, the three “lifelines” available are each painfully thin: The reason Kraken can sue is that it is pursuing fraud and civil theft, two claims that contractual disclaimers cannot foreclose. Most institutional clients pursuing breach-of-contract claims will find the liability was already contracted away. […]
Safeheron Achieves SOC 2 Type II Certification Again
Safeheron has once again completed its SOC 2 Type II audit and received certification. SOC 2 Type II is an independent security audit framework established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), assessing service organizations across three trust service criteria: security, availability, and confidentiality. Unlike a point-in-time evaluation (Type I), Type II requires auditors to examine whether controls operate consistently over an extended period — typically six to twelve months. It tests execution, not just documentation. This audit was conducted by one of the Big Four accounting firms. Passing this audit is not a formality for us. It is a real test of whether our internal standards hold up to independent scrutiny — across key management, access controls, system availability, and data confidentiality. Each time we pass, it reflects the work put in before the auditors arrive. A current certification verified by a globally recognized audit firm is our most concrete commitment to security, not just a claim. For more information on our compliance certifications, please contact our team.
Safeheron and Embed Financial Group Holdings (EFGH) Announce Strategic Partnership to Deliver Ultimate Key Sovereignty for VNL1 and Sovereign Finternets
SINGAPORE — May 8, 2026 — Embed Financial Group Holdings (“EFGH”), a premier provider of next-generation financial infrastructure, today announced a strategic partnership with Safeheron, a pioneer in institutional-grade digital asset custody solutions. This collaboration will integrate Safeheron’s advanced MPC-TEE-HSM architecture into EFGH’s sovereign chain projects, establishing an uncompromised standard for security and key sovereignty, beginning with the Vietnam Layer One (VNL1) network. As nations and institutions transition toward decentralized financial systems under the “Finternet” framework, the requirements for data localization and cryptographic control have become paramount. For national-scale infrastructure like VNL1, standard SaaS custody models—where a vendor retains a key shard—are often insufficient. Sovereign networks require absolute, uncompromising control over their own cryptographic material. Through this partnership, EFGH will leverage Safeheron’s On-Premise Full Platform. This deployment model ensures that all key shards are held exclusively by the deploying institution, with Safeheron holding zero shards. This guarantees that critical data never leaves the bank-controlled or sovereign infrastructure. “When we build sovereign Finternets, true autonomy means holding your own keys at the foundational layer,” said Chia Hock Lai, Asia CEO at EFGH. “Safeheron’s architecture allows us to deploy VNL1 with absolute key sovereignty. What’s truly exciting is that we are seeing rapidly increasing demand for exactly this type of highly customized, sovereign infrastructure in jurisdictions far beyond Vietnam. Governments and regulated […]
The $300M Lost Post-Mortem: The Institutional Trust Chain Doesn’t End at Multisig
Multisig Was in Place, and the Attack Still Succeeded Two major security incidents recently shook the crypto industry. Resolv Labs and Drift collectively lost over $300 million. The Resolv incident is relatively straightforward: critical assets were managed by a single private key. Once that key was compromised, $25 million was drained. This type of attack has precedent, and established countermeasures exist. The Drift incident is more unsettling. Drift is a protocol that had deployed a multisig scheme. In the security calculus of many institutions, multisig is practically synonymous with “we’ve done our due diligence.” But the attackers didn’t crack any keys or circumvent the signing mechanism. Instead, they got the signers to sign voluntarily — and held onto those pre-signed transactions for later execution. A timelock was supposed to serve as a buffer. Even if a malicious transaction were triggered, the delay window would give the community time to detect and intervene. But governance had already changed the configuration to Zero Timelock before the attack. The buffer vanished, and the stockpiled signatures became immediately executable. The multisig mechanism remained intact. The protection was gone. Both incidents point to the same underlying problem: digital asset security is not about whether multisig is in place — it’s about whether every link in the trust chain is effectively constrained. Resolv: One Minting Key, […]
Kelp Exploit Post-Mortem: Three Treasury Risk Blind Spots Behind the $292M Loss
Disclaimer: This article is based on publicly available on-chain data and event coverage as of April 20, 2026. Specific figures and timelines may be updated as subsequent investigations unfold. This article does not constitute investment advice, legal opinion, or an endorsement or criticism of any specific third-party protocol. Market trend discussions represent mechanism-level analysis and do not constitute price predictions. Over the past 48 hours, DeFi saw its largest security incident of 2026: Kelp DAO lost assets equivalent to over 100,000 ETH via a cross-chain bridge exploit. The impact rapidly spread to Aave’s lending markets, dragging stablecoin pool liquidity along with it. On the surface, this looks like an LRT (liquid restaking token) incident with no direct bearing on institutional treasury operations. Look closer at the technical root cause and the propagation chain, however, and three structural blind spots in institutional asset management emerge — blind spots that have nothing to do with DeFi yield strategies, and everything to do with any institution that uses cross-chain assets, interacts with third-party liquidity layers, or segments capital into “liquid” and “yield-generating” buckets. What does this incident demand from institutions in terms of custody architecture, cross-chain risk assessment, and liquidity tier design? What Happened: Root Cause Matters More Than the Dollar Figure Attack Vector Per LayerZero’s official disclosure, the attack was orchestrated by […]
