Keep Your Funds
Safe From Here On
Safeheron offers enterprise-grade digital asset self-custody services and MPC privatization solutions, ensuring the highest level of security for your assets.
Secure, Efficient, Scalable
Top-tier, battle-tested security solutions for 260+ institutions since 2021.
RAISED
PEAK AUC
SECURELY TRANSFERRED
Committed to the highest standards of security and compliance.
Certified and Insured
Partner with Top Security and Compliance Partners
Compliance in Action
Explore Our Trust Center
MPC Self-Custody
Enterprise-grade digital asset self-custody services
Eliminate single-point failures to manage digital assets
- MPC and TEE technologies protect your digital assets with the highest level of security.
- Manage wallets and transfer funds on multiple terminals, including the mobile App and Web Console.
- Policy Engine flexibly controls access authorization.
- Off-chain multisignature enhances approval privacy and significantly reduces on-chain transaction fees.
Interact with dApps under multi-party control
- Supports all public EVM-compatible blockchains and DeFi protocols.
- Policy Engine meticulously delegates transaction permissions.
- Real-time contract monitoring and phishing detection safeguard every transaction.
- Customize RPC nodes for diverse business scenarios.
- Collaboratively manage smart contract owner’s permissions to reduce single-point risk in critical operations.
Enterprise-grade digital asset self-custody services
- Seamlessly create and manage millions of MPC wallets with APIs.
- Automatic gas fuelling and sweeping significantly improve integration efficiency and accelerate your business success.
- Web3 API securely controls the entire lifecycle of smart contracts.
- API Co-Signer automates transaction approval and signing.
- MPC and TEE technologies provide multi-layer security to eliminate single-point-of-failure risk for private keys.
MPC Node Suite
White-label MPC privatization solutions
Flexibly build MPC wallets for seamless integration into your applications
- Fully privatized, with hardware-level data security and privacy protection under your control.
- A secure, universal, and cross-platform MPC-TSS key management solution.
- Support diverse business scenarios to accelerate your success.
Safest software is
open source
Safeheron independently developed MPC algorithms and is now the world's first company to open-source the mainstream MPC-TSS algorithm in C++.
Why choose us?
100% control over assets
3-of-3 MPC-TSS key management eliminates the single-point failures with full asset control.
Open-source algorithms
Safeheron open-sourced the world's first MPC-TSS algorithm library implemented in C++.
Maximum security
Safeheron’s multi-layer security defenses against state-level attacks.
Certified and insured
Safeheron is certified with ISO/IEC 27001:2022 and SOC 2 and is insured by Lockton.
Extensive features
Safeheron offers one-stop management for Web3, DeFi, NFTs, and smart contracts.
Governance and policy
TEE Policy Engine customizes multi-dimensional policies and approval workflows.
Technical support
Robust technical support encompasses use cases, solutions, technologies, and security expertise.
Diversified solutions
Battle-tested SaaS services and MPC privatization solutions.
Hear from our customers
Our partnership with Safeheron has unlocked new possibilities in digital payment through advanced MPC and TEE technology. This collaboration strengthens our security, scalability, and compliance, enabling us to meet the highest standards. With Safeheron’s powerful MPC self-custody solution, dtcpay continues to provide our users with institutional-grade security, seamless transactions, and an intuitive user experience, reinforcing our commitment to advancing the future of digital payments.
As a trusted financial service provider, we have strict standards when choosing our security infrastructure provider. Safeheron turns out to be a great match. Its MPC self-custody solution eliminates private key risks while providing enterprise-grade security with ease of use. With Safeheron’s sophisticated technology, we are confident to provide our customers with a reliable and secure digital payment experience.
The Safeheron team has in-depth expertise and extensive practical experience in blockchain security. With a highly robust security mechanism, a comprehensive permission management system, and an excellent user experience, Safeheron has provided strong support for our institutional trading services in the Asia region. We look forward to further deepening our collaboration.
UXUY has developed a highly secure key management service powered by Safeheron's MPC technology. In today's challenging cyber environment where digital assets face numerous security threats, Safeheron's mature solution provides us with robust technical assurance. Through this innovative MPC solution, we have effectively reduced the risks of private key leakage and asset theft, delivering users a seamless experience that combines both security and convenience.
With Safeheron’s hardcore MPC technology, we ensure the highest level of security for our clients' crypto funds within our crypto-to-fiat feature. In addition, Safeheron's customer support exemplifies excellence, promptly resolving issues to maintain our uninterrupted operations.
Partnering with Safeheron has been transformative for AlphaYield. Their MPC + TEE platform delivers the enterprise-grade security and operational efficiency we need to execute large institutional trades with complete confidence, while their exceptional team consistently goes above and beyond to support our evolving needs.
Security, flexibility, and compliance — all solved on one platform. Since integrating Safeheron, our business volume has tripled.
Latest Updates from Safeheron
How Should Businesses Build a Crypto Incident Response Plan?
How should businesses build a crypto incident response plan? A workable plan answers four questions: who is responsible for what, which situations count as which severity level, what exact steps to follow at each level, and how to review and improve afterward. The plan must be written in advance and rehearsed regularly, because on-chain transfers cannot be reversed and the first few minutes after an incident often decide how much is lost. Why Must an Incident Response Plan Be Written in Advance? Once crypto assets are stolen, attackers usually spread the funds across many addresses, bridge them to other chains or swap them into other assets within minutes, and the later you act, the less chance there is of freezing or recovering them. The team is under intense pressure during an incident. If that is when people start debating whether to pause withdrawals, who has authority to freeze, or whether to tell customers, it is easy to hesitate, skip steps or even make decisions that make things worse. A plan makes these decisions ahead of time, so during an incident the team only has to execute. How Should Roles Be Divided in an Incident Response Plan? At least four roles should be defined: an incident lead who directs the response and makes key decisions; a technical responder who pauses outflows, […]
How to Automate Crypto Reconciliation
How do you automate crypto reconciliation? The key is making data match from the source: the wallet system generates a structured record for every transaction as it happens and syncs it in real time to the business and finance systems, then scheduled reconciliation jobs match everything automatically and pass only mismatches to people. That way, as transaction volume grows, the headcount needed for reconciliation does not have to grow with it. What Reconciliation Data Should the Wallet System Record? Every transaction should at least include the business order ID, the chain and asset, the sending and receiving addresses, the amount, the actual fee, the transaction hash and the current status. These fields are the foundation for everything crypto reconciliation should check. The business order ID matters most: it is the reference that ties an on-chain transaction to a business record, and without it you are left guessing from amounts and timestamps. Status should also be granular, such as submitted, on-chain, confirmed, failed or replaced, so reconciliation can tell which differences are just normal timing gaps. How Should Reconciliation Data Be Synced to Business and Finance Systems? A reliable approach combines push and pull: the wallet system pushes updates via callbacks whenever a transaction’s status changes, and the business system periodically pulls the full record set through the API as a […]
What Should Crypto Reconciliation Check?
What should crypto reconciliation check? There are four main items: the balance of every address and asset, every transaction record, whether customer assets match the on-chain assets the business actually holds, and fee costs. Balances and transactions prove where the money is and how it got there, customer assets prove there is enough of it, and fees close the small gap that is easiest to overlook. How Should Balances Be Reconciled? Balance reconciliation should take a snapshot at the same block height or point in time; otherwise on-chain data and system data reflect different moments, and mismatches are to be expected. The snapshot should go down to three dimensions: chain, token contract and address. Looking only at totals can hide one address having too much while another has too little. The same token on different chains is a different asset, so USDT on different chains, for example, must be counted separately. For UTXO-based chains, you also need to confirm that all unspent outputs are counted correctly. How Should Transaction Records Be Reconciled? Every deposit, withdrawal, payment and internal transfer must map one-to-one to an on-chain transaction hash and an order in the business system. A transaction that exists on-chain but not in the system may be a missed deposit, or an unauthorized outflow; one that exists in the system but […]
How Should Businesses Reconcile Crypto Assets?
How should businesses reconcile crypto assets? The core is to regularly align three sets of books: actual on-chain balances and transactions, the records in the wallet system, and user balances and payment records in the business and finance systems. Check all three item by item by chain, asset and address, and when differences appear, find the cause and keep a record. Done well, reconciliation catches fund anomalies early and forms the basis for audits and regulatory reviews. Why Is Crypto Reconciliation Harder Than Traditional Reconciliation? Traditional reconciliation usually deals with a handful of bank accounts, while crypto businesses often manage dozens of chains, hundreds of tokens and thousands of addresses at once. On-chain transfers incur fees, usually paid in a different asset from the one being sent. For exchanges, user deposits first land in deposit addresses and are then moved to the hot wallet through fund sweeping, generating large numbers of internal transfers along the way. Add block confirmation times, possible chain reorganizations and unknown tokens that others send to your addresses, and differences between the books and the chain arise easily. What Does Crypto Reconciliation Need to Check? There are four main items crypto reconciliation should check: the balance of every address and asset, every transaction record, whether customer assets are fully backed by on-chain holdings, and separately recorded […]
How Can Businesses Avoid Blind Signing Risks?
How can businesses avoid blind signing risks? Work on three layers: decode every transaction into human-readable form and simulate its outcome before signing, have approvers verify it on independent devices, and use pre-signing rules to block dangerous operations. The first two make transactions understandable; the last ensures that even if someone signs without understanding, a dangerous transaction still cannot go through. How Do You Help Signers Understand What They Are Signing? The first step is decoding: translate the call data back into the target contract, the method being called, the approved spender and the amount, and break down off-chain signature messages field by field. The second step is simulation: execute the transaction against current on-chain state before signing and show the signer exactly which assets will decrease and which address will gain what permissions, so that “what you sign” matches “what happens”. High-risk operations such as token approvals and wallet permission changes should also be clearly flagged rather than mixed in with ordinary transfers. Why Should Approvers Verify on Independent Devices? If transactions are initiated and approved through the same web page, then once that page is tampered with, everyone sees false information. A safer approach is for approvers to review the full transaction, decoded again on the server side, in a separate approval app or device, and compare it […]