Keep Your Funds
Safe From Here On
Safeheron offers enterprise-grade digital asset self-custody services and MPC privatization solutions, ensuring the highest level of security for your assets.
Secure, Efficient, Scalable
Top-tier, battle-tested security solutions for 260+ institutions since 2021.
RAISED
PEAK AUC
SECURELY TRANSFERRED
Committed to the highest standards of security and compliance.
Certified and Insured
Partner with Top Security and Compliance Partners
Compliance in Action
Explore Our Trust Center
MPC Self-Custody
Enterprise-grade digital asset self-custody services
Eliminate single-point failures to manage digital assets
- MPC and TEE technologies protect your digital assets with the highest level of security.
- Manage wallets and transfer funds on multiple terminals, including the mobile App and Web Console.
- Policy Engine flexibly controls access authorization.
- Off-chain multisignature enhances approval privacy and significantly reduces on-chain transaction fees.
Interact with dApps under multi-party control
- Supports all public EVM-compatible blockchains and DeFi protocols.
- Policy Engine meticulously delegates transaction permissions.
- Real-time contract monitoring and phishing detection safeguard every transaction.
- Customize RPC nodes for diverse business scenarios.
- Collaboratively manage smart contract owner’s permissions to reduce single-point risk in critical operations.
Enterprise-grade digital asset self-custody services
- Seamlessly create and manage millions of MPC wallets with APIs.
- Automatic gas fuelling and sweeping significantly improve integration efficiency and accelerate your business success.
- Web3 API securely controls the entire lifecycle of smart contracts.
- API Co-Signer automates transaction approval and signing.
- MPC and TEE technologies provide multi-layer security to eliminate single-point-of-failure risk for private keys.
MPC Node Suite
White-label MPC privatization solutions
Flexibly build MPC wallets for seamless integration into your applications
- Fully privatized, with hardware-level data security and privacy protection under your control.
- A secure, universal, and cross-platform MPC-TSS key management solution.
- Support diverse business scenarios to accelerate your success.
Safest software is
open source
Safeheron independently developed MPC algorithms and is now the world's first company to open-source the mainstream MPC-TSS algorithm in C++.
Why choose us?
100% control over assets
3-of-3 MPC-TSS key management eliminates the single-point failures with full asset control.
Open-source algorithms
Safeheron open-sourced the world's first MPC-TSS algorithm library implemented in C++.
Maximum security
Safeheron’s multi-layer security defenses against state-level attacks.
Certified and insured
Safeheron is certified with ISO/IEC 27001:2022 and SOC 2 and is insured by Lockton.
Extensive features
Safeheron offers one-stop management for Web3, DeFi, NFTs, and smart contracts.
Governance and policy
TEE Policy Engine customizes multi-dimensional policies and approval workflows.
Technical support
Robust technical support encompasses use cases, solutions, technologies, and security expertise.
Diversified solutions
Battle-tested SaaS services and MPC privatization solutions.
Hear from our customers
Our partnership with Safeheron has unlocked new possibilities in digital payment through advanced MPC and TEE technology. This collaboration strengthens our security, scalability, and compliance, enabling us to meet the highest standards. With Safeheron’s powerful MPC self-custody solution, dtcpay continues to provide our users with institutional-grade security, seamless transactions, and an intuitive user experience, reinforcing our commitment to advancing the future of digital payments.
As a trusted financial service provider, we have strict standards when choosing our security infrastructure provider. Safeheron turns out to be a great match. Its MPC self-custody solution eliminates private key risks while providing enterprise-grade security with ease of use. With Safeheron’s sophisticated technology, we are confident to provide our customers with a reliable and secure digital payment experience.
The Safeheron team has in-depth expertise and extensive practical experience in blockchain security. With a highly robust security mechanism, a comprehensive permission management system, and an excellent user experience, Safeheron has provided strong support for our institutional trading services in the Asia region. We look forward to further deepening our collaboration.
UXUY has developed a highly secure key management service powered by Safeheron's MPC technology. In today's challenging cyber environment where digital assets face numerous security threats, Safeheron's mature solution provides us with robust technical assurance. Through this innovative MPC solution, we have effectively reduced the risks of private key leakage and asset theft, delivering users a seamless experience that combines both security and convenience.
With Safeheron’s hardcore MPC technology, we ensure the highest level of security for our clients' crypto funds within our crypto-to-fiat feature. In addition, Safeheron's customer support exemplifies excellence, promptly resolving issues to maintain our uninterrupted operations.
Latest Updates from Safeheron
Multi-Trader Crypto Wallet with Risk Limits: The Master Account and Sub-Account Model
“Multi-trader wallet” usually means one of two very different things One version is a prop trading firm that hands its own money to independent traders and takes a cut of the profit. That’s a specific setup with its own rules. This article is about a different, more common one: a broker, a fund manager, or a trading firm that needs to give many clients — or many of its own internal desks — access to trade, while keeping every one of them inside limits the firm itself controls. Nobody is being “funded” here in the prop-firm sense. It’s one firm’s own infrastructure, shared across many people who each need their own boundaries. The master account sets the outer edge — sub-accounts can only get stricter, never looser The way this usually works is a master account sits on top, and every trader or client gets their own sub-account underneath it. The master account sets hard limits that apply to everyone — the most leverage anyone can use, the biggest position anyone can open, the most anyone can lose in a day, and which assets are even allowed to trade. A sub-account can be set tighter than that master limit, for a more cautious client or a newer trader, but it can never be set looser. So if the master account […]
DeFi Wallet with Transaction Limits: How Institutions Control Risk
A DeFi transaction can do much more than send tokens. It may swap assets, supply collateral, open a loan, add liquidity, stake funds, or give a smart contract permission to spend tokens later. That flexibility is useful, but it increases the cost of a mistake. A trader may enter the wrong amount. A bot may repeat an order hundreds of times. A malicious website may request unlimited token access. A DeFi wallet with transaction limits checks a request before signing it. Normal activity can continue quickly, while large, unusual, or forbidden requests can require more approval or be rejected. The strongest design does not rely on one daily number. It combines limits for value, frequency, assets, contracts, token allowances, gas, and total portfolio exposure. What Are DeFi Wallet Transaction Limits? Transaction limits are rules that decide what a wallet is allowed to sign. When a person or trading system creates a request, the wallet and connected risk systems compare it with those rules. The result may be one of three actions: These controls are not automatically provided by a blockchain. An institution must build them into its trading system, wallet policy, approval process, or smart contract wallet. Why Is One Spending Limit Not Enough? Suppose the maximum trade is $100,000. A faulty bot could submit twenty trades worth $90,000 each. […]
DeFi Trading Wallet with Approval Workflow: A Practical Guide
DeFi moves quickly, but mistakes are difficult to reverse. A trader may connect to a fake website. A bot may call the wrong contract. An approver may click “approve” without understanding the transaction. Once a transaction is on-chain, a bank or platform usually cannot cancel it. A DeFi trading wallet with approval workflow should not rely on one private key or one confirmation button. It should separate transaction creation, risk checks, human approval, and final signing. Each step needs an owner, a limit, and a record. This guide explains that workflow in plain language and shows where Safeheron’s Web3 Wallet, Policy Engine, and MPC capabilities may fit. Why Is DeFi Approval Harder Than a Normal Transfer? A normal transfer usually asks three questions: Which asset? How much? Which destination? A DeFi request can be more complex: The approver must confirm what the wallet will actually do, not merely what the trader intends. The Seven Steps of a Strong Approval Workflow If the amount, contract, recipient, or another important field changes, earlier approvals should become invalid. Who Should Approve? Role Main job Should not be able to Trader Create policy-compliant transactions Approve own request alone Investment lead Confirm the action fits the strategy Change wallet security settings Operations Check chain, address, gas, and settlement Raise investment limits Risk or compliance Review […]
Wallet Infrastructure for Institutional Onchain Strategies: Why Hidden Shared Risk Matters More Than the Strategy Itself
Running many onchain strategies at once is a different job than picking one good strategy In 2026, institutions running onchain money usually aren’t doing just one thing. A fund might run stablecoin lending, a delta-neutral trade, liquid staking combined with a yield vault, and a real-world-asset strategy, all at the same time. Picking good strategies is one job. Running many of them at once, safely, is a completely different job — and it’s mostly a wallet and operations problem, not a strategy problem. One respected voice in this space put it simply: the thing that actually separates winners from losers here “will be determined by infrastructure, not strategy.” The hidden risk: strategies that look separate can share the same weak point Here’s the problem that catches institutions off guard. Two or three strategies can look completely unrelated on paper, but underneath, they might all depend on the same collateral token. If that one token has a problem, every strategy built on top of it has a problem at the same time — even though nobody planned for that. This isn’t a hypothetical: in April 2026, a single cross-chain collateral token lost its peg, and roughly $14 billion left DeFi in just 48 hours. Institutions running several onchain strategies need to check for this kind of hidden connection constantly, not just […]
Secure Institutional Wallet for Staking and DeFi: A Practical Guide
When an institution uses crypto for staking or DeFi, the assets no longer sit still. Funds may enter a validator, lending platform, liquidity pool, or staking protocol. Returns change, prices move, and risk continues after the first transaction. A secure institutional wallet for staking and DeFi must do more than protect a private key. It should answer simple but important questions: Who may invest? How much? Which protocols are allowed? Where do rewards go? How can the institution exit during an emergency? This guide explains those controls in plain language and shows where Safeheron may fit. How Are Staking and DeFi Different? Staking uses assets to support a blockchain network and earn rewards. DeFi uses smart contracts for activities such as lending, trading, or providing liquidity. Their risks are different: Activity Return Main risks Native staking Validator rewards Downtime, incorrect signing, slashing Delegated staking Provider operates validators Provider, concentration, and exit risk Liquid staking Rewards plus a tradable staking token Contract, exchange-rate, liquidity, and depeg risk DeFi lending Interest and incentives Liquidation, oracle, and contract risk Liquidity pools Trading fees and incentives Impermanent loss, slippage, and contract risk Two products may both advertise “yield” while requiring very different wallet limits and approval rules. Why Use More Than One Wallet? A long-term reserve wallet should not connect directly to every DeFi […]
