Keep Your Funds
Safe From Here On
Safeheron offers enterprise-grade digital asset self-custody services and MPC privatization solutions, ensuring the highest level of security for your assets.
Secure, Efficient, Scalable
Top-tier, battle-tested security solutions for 260+ institutions since 2021.
RAISED
PEAK AUC
SECURELY TRANSFERRED
Committed to the highest standards of security and compliance.
Certified and Insured
Partner with Top Security and Compliance Partners
Compliance in Action
Explore Our Trust Center
MPC Self-Custody
Enterprise-grade digital asset self-custody services
Eliminate single-point failures to manage digital assets
- MPC and TEE technologies protect your digital assets with the highest level of security.
- Manage wallets and transfer funds on multiple terminals, including the mobile App and Web Console.
- Policy Engine flexibly controls access authorization.
- Off-chain multisignature enhances approval privacy and significantly reduces on-chain transaction fees.
Interact with dApps under multi-party control
- Supports all public EVM-compatible blockchains and DeFi protocols.
- Policy Engine meticulously delegates transaction permissions.
- Real-time contract monitoring and phishing detection safeguard every transaction.
- Customize RPC nodes for diverse business scenarios.
- Collaboratively manage smart contract owner’s permissions to reduce single-point risk in critical operations.
Enterprise-grade digital asset self-custody services
- Seamlessly create and manage millions of MPC wallets with APIs.
- Automatic gas fuelling and sweeping significantly improve integration efficiency and accelerate your business success.
- Web3 API securely controls the entire lifecycle of smart contracts.
- API Co-Signer automates transaction approval and signing.
- MPC and TEE technologies provide multi-layer security to eliminate single-point-of-failure risk for private keys.
MPC Node Suite
White-label MPC privatization solutions
Flexibly build MPC wallets for seamless integration into your applications
- Fully privatized, with hardware-level data security and privacy protection under your control.
- A secure, universal, and cross-platform MPC-TSS key management solution.
- Support diverse business scenarios to accelerate your success.
Safest software is
open source
Safeheron independently developed MPC algorithms and is now the world's first company to open-source the mainstream MPC-TSS algorithm in C++.
Why choose us?
100% control over assets
3-of-3 MPC-TSS key management eliminates the single-point failures with full asset control.
Open-source algorithms
Safeheron open-sourced the world's first MPC-TSS algorithm library implemented in C++.
Maximum security
Safeheron’s multi-layer security defenses against state-level attacks.
Certified and insured
Safeheron is certified with ISO/IEC 27001:2022 and SOC 2 and is insured by Lockton.
Extensive features
Safeheron offers one-stop management for Web3, DeFi, NFTs, and smart contracts.
Governance and policy
TEE Policy Engine customizes multi-dimensional policies and approval workflows.
Technical support
Robust technical support encompasses use cases, solutions, technologies, and security expertise.
Diversified solutions
Battle-tested SaaS services and MPC privatization solutions.
Hear from our customers
Our partnership with Safeheron has unlocked new possibilities in digital payment through advanced MPC and TEE technology. This collaboration strengthens our security, scalability, and compliance, enabling us to meet the highest standards. With Safeheron’s powerful MPC self-custody solution, dtcpay continues to provide our users with institutional-grade security, seamless transactions, and an intuitive user experience, reinforcing our commitment to advancing the future of digital payments.
As a trusted financial service provider, we have strict standards when choosing our security infrastructure provider. Safeheron turns out to be a great match. Its MPC self-custody solution eliminates private key risks while providing enterprise-grade security with ease of use. With Safeheron’s sophisticated technology, we are confident to provide our customers with a reliable and secure digital payment experience.
The Safeheron team has in-depth expertise and extensive practical experience in blockchain security. With a highly robust security mechanism, a comprehensive permission management system, and an excellent user experience, Safeheron has provided strong support for our institutional trading services in the Asia region. We look forward to further deepening our collaboration.
UXUY has developed a highly secure key management service powered by Safeheron's MPC technology. In today's challenging cyber environment where digital assets face numerous security threats, Safeheron's mature solution provides us with robust technical assurance. Through this innovative MPC solution, we have effectively reduced the risks of private key leakage and asset theft, delivering users a seamless experience that combines both security and convenience.
With Safeheron’s hardcore MPC technology, we ensure the highest level of security for our clients' crypto funds within our crypto-to-fiat feature. In addition, Safeheron's customer support exemplifies excellence, promptly resolving issues to maintain our uninterrupted operations.
Latest Updates from Safeheron
Audit-Ready Digital Asset Wallet Infrastructure for Funds: What Auditors Actually Test
“Audit-ready” is a specific, testable standard — not a marketing claim. A hedge fund, crypto-native fund, or asset manager preparing for its annual audit doesn’t need a wallet that’s generically “secure.” It needs one that can survive a specific set of procedures an independent auditor and a fund administrator will actually run: reconciling every transaction against the blockchain, verifying that the fund — not a third party, not a departed employee, not the custodian unilaterally — actually controls the private keys, and producing documentation on demand rather than after a scramble. Most infrastructure discussions treat custody as a security question. For a fund heading into its first or fifteenth annual audit, it’s just as much a documentation and provability question, and the wallet architecture underneath either supports that or actively works against it. SOC 1 Type II and SOC 2 Type II answer different questions, and funds usually need both These two reports get conflated constantly, but they test different things. A SOC 1 Type II report addresses controls relevant to a service organization’s impact on a client’s financial reporting — the report a fund’s own auditor will want when the custodian’s processes touch NAV calculation, transaction processing, or anything else that flows into the fund’s financial statements. A SOC 2 Type II report addresses a different control set entirely: […]
Multi-User Digital Asset Wallet for Fintech: More Than Multiple Logins
On Monday morning, operations needs to release a merchant settlement batch. Finance wants to verify the total. Compliance flags one new destination for review. An engineering service is ready to submit the transactions automatically. The executive approver is in another time zone and cannot come online immediately. With a shared wallet account, the team must either wait for one person or work around the process. With a simplistic second-click approval, the compliance decision may still have no effect on signing. A genuine multi user digital asset wallet for fintech converts responsibility into rules the wallet cannot ignore: who may initiate, who may see, who must approve, when a request escalates, which machines may act automatically, and what conditions must be satisfied before signing. This guide treats multi-user wallet design as an organizational-control problem rather than a feature checklist. It explains how identity, roles, approval, MPC signing, machine automation, evidence, and recovery fit together—and where Safeheron may be relevant. The Short Answer: A Multi-User Wallet Has Four Control Layers A product may allow 50 members without providing meaningful governance. An enterprise-ready design addresses four distinct layers: Layer Question it answers Common failure Identity and access Who can log in, view, or create actions? Shared accounts; former staff retain access Business authorization Which departments must approve this transaction? One workflow for everything, […]
How Can a Digital Bank Securely Offer Crypto Wallets? A Three-Layer Framework
When a licensed digital bank asks how to securely offer crypto wallets, the question has more layers than it does for a typical startup fintech app. A bank isn’t just adding a feature — it’s bringing a new asset class onto its balance sheet with its own capital treatment, exposing existing retail customers to a fraud pattern that behaves differently from card and ACH fraud, and doing all of this under supervisory scrutiny that a newer, unlicensed fintech doesn’t yet face. “Secure” has to hold across three distinct layers: capital and prudential treatment, retail fraud and account-takeover exposure, and the underlying custody technology itself. Layer one: capital treatment under Basel SCO60 Since a bank’s crypto exposure sits on a regulated balance sheet, the first security question is a capital one, not a technical one. Under the Basel Committee’s SCO60 cryptoasset standard, exposures are classified into two groups with very different treatment. Group 1 assets — tokenized traditional assets, and stablecoins with an effective stabilization mechanism, redemption-risk controls, and appropriate supervisory features — are generally capitalized based on the risk weight of their underlying exposure. Group 2 assets, which fail one or more of those classification conditions, face strict caps: holdings should generally stay below 1% of Tier 1 capital and must not exceed 2%, with any excess converted to the […]
Stablecoin Wallet Infrastructure for Fintech Companies: The One-Wallet-Per-User Problem
An exchange’s wallet infrastructure handles a manageable number of hot, warm, and cold wallets processing high transaction volume. An enterprise treasury desk manages a handful of wallets holding large balances. A consumer fintech app — a savings product, a remittance app, a neobank adding stablecoin balances — faces a structurally different problem: potentially millions of individual users, each of whom needs a wallet, provisioned automatically at signup, with no manual setup and no visible trace of blockchain mechanics. That’s not a variation on institutional custody; it’s a different architecture question entirely, and it’s the one most “stablecoin infrastructure” content skips past. Individual wallets, not a pooled balance The architectural decision that matters most here is whether each user gets a genuinely separate, segregated wallet, or whether the fintech pools funds into a small number of omnibus wallets and tracks individual balances in an internal ledger. Individual embedded wallets — provisioned programmatically per user via API, with no manual setup — are increasingly the model fintech platforms converge on, for reasons that go beyond user trust. When every user has their own wallet inside the platform, policy enforcement can operate at the individual wallet level rather than only at the platform level, meaning transaction rules, limits, and compliance checks apply consistently per account rather than requiring a separate reconciliation layer to […]
Digital Bank Crypto Wallet Infrastructure: Connecting the Core Ledger to Blockchains
Digital bank crypto wallet infrastructure is the controlled execution layer connecting customer digital-asset accounts, the core banking ledger, blockchain networks, and treasury operations. It does more than create addresses and sign transactions. It must support deposit detection, withdrawals, stablecoin payments, automated sweeping, gas management, wallet tiers, risk screening, approval, reconciliation, audit, and disaster recovery. For a digital bank offering digital-asset deposits and withdrawals, stablecoin accounts, cross-border payments, business treasury, or crypto conversion, the hard problem is not adding a “wallet” screen to an app. It is keeping customer rights, internal liabilities, on-chain assets, and signing authority consistent under both high volume and failure conditions. What Is Digital Bank Crypto Wallet Infrastructure? A personal wallet generally serves one holder. A digital bank’s wallet system serves many customers, operators, compliance analysts, finance teams, and automated services while handling customer assets, bank-owned assets, and network-fee funds with different legal and operational roles. A production stack commonly includes: Wallet infrastructure records how assets move on-chain. The core banking ledger records what each customer owns, what is held or in transit, and what the bank owes. The systems must work together, but they cannot replace each other. Digital Bank Wallet vs. Customer Account vs. Blockchain Address Concept What it records Primary controller Proves customer balance by itself? Customer account Identity, product relationship, permissions, status Digital […]
