Keep Your Funds
Safe From Here On

Safeheron offers enterprise-grade digital asset self-custody services and MPC privatization solutions, ensuring the highest level of security for your assets.

Secure, Efficient, Scalable

Top-tier, battle-tested security solutions for 260+ institutions since 2021.

$13M+

RAISED

$1.5B+

PEAK AUC

$300B+

SECURELY TRANSFERRED

Committed to the highest standards of security and compliance.

Certified and Insured

Partner with Top Security and Compliance Partners

Compliance in Action

Explore Our Trust Center

MPC Self-Custody

Enterprise-grade digital asset self-custody services

Eliminate single-point failures to manage digital assets

  • MPC and TEE technologies protect your digital assets with the highest level of security.
  • Manage wallets and transfer funds on multiple terminals, including the mobile App and Web Console.
  • Policy Engine flexibly controls access authorization.
  • Off-chain multisignature enhances approval privacy and significantly reduces on-chain transaction fees.
View More
Eliminate single-point failures to manage digital assets
Talk to Us

MPC Node Suite

White-label MPC privatization solutions

Flexibly build MPC wallets for seamless integration into your applications

  • Fully privatized, with hardware-level data security and privacy protection under your control.
  • A secure, universal, and cross-platform MPC-TSS key management solution.
  • Support diverse business scenarios to accelerate your success.
View More
Flexibly build MPC wallets for seamless integration into your applications
Talk to Us

Safest software is
open source

Safeheron independently developed MPC algorithms and is now the world's first company to open-source the mainstream MPC-TSS algorithm in C++.

Hear from our customers

Safeheron empowers financial institutions with secure key sharding, flexible and customizable wallet governance, and efficient, seamless approval workflows, letting institutions enjoy powerful self-custody services effortlessly.

Li Liang, Singapore CEO View More

Our partnership with Safeheron has unlocked new possibilities in digital payment through advanced MPC and TEE technology. This collaboration strengthens our security, scalability, and compliance, enabling us to meet the highest standards. With Safeheron’s powerful MPC self-custody solution, dtcpay continues to provide our users with institutional-grade security, seamless transactions, and an intuitive user experience, reinforcing our commitment to advancing the future of digital payments.

Sam Lin, CTO View More

As a trusted financial service provider, we have strict standards when choosing our security infrastructure provider. Safeheron turns out to be a great match. Its MPC self-custody solution eliminates private key risks while providing enterprise-grade security with ease of use. With Safeheron’s sophisticated technology, we are confident to provide our customers with a reliable and secure digital payment experience.

Louis Liu, Founder & CEO

The Safeheron team has in-depth expertise and extensive practical experience in blockchain security. With a highly robust security mechanism, a comprehensive permission management system, and an excellent user experience, Safeheron has provided strong support for our institutional trading services in the Asia region. We look forward to further deepening our collaboration.

Hao Chen, CEO View More

UXUY has developed a highly secure key management service powered by Safeheron's MPC technology. In today's challenging cyber environment where digital assets face numerous security threats, Safeheron's mature solution provides us with robust technical assurance. Through this innovative MPC solution, we have effectively reduced the risks of private key leakage and asset theft, delivering users a seamless experience that combines both security and convenience.

Max, CTO

With Safeheron’s hardcore MPC technology, we ensure the highest level of security for our clients' crypto funds within our crypto-to-fiat feature. In addition, Safeheron's customer support exemplifies excellence, promptly resolving issues to maintain our uninterrupted operations.

Jean-Baptiste Chenut, CFO View More

Partnering with Safeheron has been transformative for AlphaYield. Their MPC + TEE platform delivers the enterprise-grade security and operational efficiency we need to execute large institutional trades with complete confidence, while their exceptional team consistently goes above and beyond to support our evolving needs.

Michael Pearson, CEO View More

Security, flexibility, and compliance — all solved on one platform. Since integrating Safeheron, our business volume has tripled.

Christian Li, CEO View More

Latest Updates from Safeheron

Web3 Learning

Who Is Responsible for Compliance When Using a Third-Party Wallet Provider?

Who is responsible for compliance when using a third-party wallet provider? Responsibility remains with the regulated, customer-facing institution that uses the service. Regulators in the EU, the UK, Singapore and Hong Kong have all made clear that outsourcing a function to a third party does not transfer regulatory responsibility along with it. Under the standards of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), whether the wallet provider itself needs to be regulated depends on whether it controls customer assets. What Do the EU Rules Say? The EBA Guidelines on outsourcing arrangements, published by the European Banking Authority (EBA) in 2019, provide that outsourcing a function cannot result in the delegation of management body responsibilities, and that institutions remain fully responsible for their regulatory obligations. The Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), which has applied since 17 January 2025, likewise states that financial entities remain at all times fully responsible for complying with their obligations under the regulation, including when using third-party ICT services. On white labelling specifically, the EBA’s 2025 Report on White Labelling further states that the provider contracting with the customer bears ultimate responsibility for compliance, and is also fully responsible for anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing obligations. The report also lists “a lack of transparency about the roles and responsibilities of each party” as one of the risks white […]

By Safeheron Team 12/11/2026

Web3 Learning

How Can a Business Issue a Stablecoin?

How can a business issue a stablecoin? First choose an issuing jurisdiction and obtain a local issuance licence, then establish fully backed reserves, redemption and disclosure mechanisms as regulators require, and finally build the technical components for minting, burning and freezing. The US GENIUS Act, the EU’s MiCA, Hong Kong’s Stablecoins Ordinance and Singapore’s stablecoin framework all allow only authorized entities to issue regulated stablecoins in their jurisdictions. What Licences Are Needed to Issue a Stablecoin? In the US, the GENIUS Act provides that only a “permitted payment stablecoin issuer” may issue payment stablecoins. This includes approved subsidiaries of insured depository institutions, federal qualified issuers and state qualified issuers; state qualified issuers with no more than US$10 billion in outstanding issuance may opt for state-level supervision. According to an announcement by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the Act takes effect on 18 January 2027. In the EU, MiCA requires issuers of e-money tokens (EMTs) to be credit institutions or electronic money institutions, and to submit a crypto-asset white paper to the competent authority and publish it; issuing asset-referenced tokens (ARTs) requires separate authorization. MiCA explains the difference between these two token types. In Hong Kong, issuing a fiat-referenced stablecoin requires a licence from the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) and paid-up share capital of at least […]

By Safeheron Team 12/11/2026

Web3 Learning

What Is the Difference Between a White-Label Wallet, Wallet-as-a-Service and an Embedded Wallet?

What is the difference between a white-label wallet, Wallet-as-a-Service and an embedded wallet? The three describe different sides of the same thing: white label emphasises that the brand belongs to the business while the technology comes from a provider; Wallet-as-a-Service (WaaS) emphasises that wallet functionality is delivered through APIs; and an embedded wallet emphasises that the wallet is built directly into an app and used seamlessly by end users. A single product can be all three at once. What Is Each of the Three? A white-label crypto wallet is a business model. The European Banking Authority (EBA) defines white labelling as an arrangement in which an institution agrees with a partner to distribute and provide financial products or services under the partner’s own brand. Applied to wallets, customers see the business’s brand, while the underlying technology comes from the provider. Wallet-as-a-Service (WaaS) is a delivery model: wallet infrastructure is provided via APIs, allowing businesses to integrate digital asset wallet functionality into their own apps without building the underlying layer from scratch. An embedded wallet is a product form: the wallet is built directly into an app and created automatically when the user signs up, with no need to install a separate wallet or safeguard a seed phrase. How Do the Three Relate to Each Other? The three answer different questions. […]

By Safeheron Team 12/11/2026

Web3 Learning

What Are the Steps to Develop a White-Label Crypto Wallet?

What are the steps to develop a white-label crypto wallet? With a white-label solution, a business does not need to write the underlying code itself, but it still has four things to do: determine the custody model and licensing, evaluate and integrate a provider, configure policies, approvals and compliance processes, and finally complete testing before going live. This article assumes the business has already decided to use a white-label solution; the comparison with building in-house is covered in how a business can launch a digital wallet. Step 1: How Do You Determine the Custody Model and Licensing? The custody model determines whether a business needs a licence. Guidance from the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) considers most custodial wallet providers to be virtual asset service providers, because they hold or safekeep virtual assets on behalf of others; providers that only develop or sell unhosted wallet software generally are not. The EU’s MiCA lists “safekeeping or controlling crypto-assets, or the means of access to them (such as private keys), on behalf of clients” as a crypto-asset service, which may only be provided in the EU by an authorized crypto-asset service provider (CASP) or by licensed entities such as credit institutions that have notified the competent authority. A business therefore needs to determine first who holds the keys or key shards for […]

By Safeheron Team 12/11/2026

How Can Banks Offer Crypto-Asset Services Through White Labelling?

How can banks offer crypto-asset services through white labelling? The bank serves customers under its own brand, while specialist firms provide the underlying custody, trading or wallet technology. However, the choice of partners and the division of responsibilities are tightly constrained: in the EU, a bank must notify the competent authority, and custody may only be delegated to licensed entities; in Hong Kong, a bank may only outsource custody to the categories of regulated entities specified by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), and bears ultimate responsibility for the outsourced activities. Why Do Banks Adopt the White-Label Model? White labelling is already common in banking. The European Banking Authority (EBA)’s 2025 Report on White Labelling shows that, in the Spring 2025 Risk Assessment Questionnaire, 35% of responding banks were engaged in white-labelling activities. The report also expects white labelling to become increasingly common in the crypto-asset space, particularly where traditional financial institutions want access to blockchain-based payment units without issuing them themselves, or want to offer crypto services without applying for a MiCA licence themselves. For banks, offering segregated custody only also has prudential significance. The crypto-asset prudential standard of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, implemented from 1 January 2026, states that custody services that safekeep or administer customers’ crypto-assets on a segregated basis generally do not give rise […]

What Is a White-Label Crypto Wallet?

What is a white-label crypto wallet? It is a crypto-asset wallet whose technology and infrastructure come from a specialist provider, while a business offers it to its customers under its own brand. In its 2025 Report on White Labelling, the European Banking Authority (EBA) defines white labelling as a provider offering one or more financial products and services that are distributed and provided to customers under a partner’s brand. Applied to crypto wallets, customers see the business’s brand, while the provider handles the underlying key management, signing and blockchain connectivity. How Is a White-Label Wallet Different from an In-House Wallet? The difference lies in who builds the underlying technology: with an in-house wallet, the business develops its own key management and blockchain connectivity, whereas a white-label wallet uses the provider’s ready-made infrastructure. The steps to develop a white-label crypto wallet explains the work a business still needs to do after choosing white labelling. White labelling does not conflict with WaaS or embedded wallets; the difference between the three is that they correspond to branding, delivery model and product form respectively. Which Businesses Are a Good Fit for a White-Label Crypto Wallet? In its report, the EBA expects white labelling to become increasingly common in the crypto-asset space as well. Banks are a typical use case: how banks can offer crypto-asset […]

What Are AI Crypto Agents?

What are AI crypto agents? They are software agents powered by large language models that can understand goals, plan multi-step actions and interact autonomously with digital services, while also holding a crypto wallet that lets them initiate payments or transactions on-chain. In a 2026 report, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) suggested that AI agents using stablecoin rails could become important infrastructure. How Are AI Crypto Agents Different from Traditional Trading Bots? The difference lies in whether they only follow preset rules. The IMF describes early expert systems as encoding human logic into static “if-then” rules, and notes that, unlike traditional automation tools, agentic systems can understand goals and monitor conditions in real time, rather than simply producing predictions or relying on continuous human involvement. Bank of England Deputy Governor Sarah Breeden has also pointed out that with agentic AI, systems can autonomously chain together a sequence of actions. The U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) describes AI agent systems as consisting of at least one generative AI model plus supporting software, capable of planning and taking autonomous actions that affect real-world systems, and able to operate with little to no human oversight. What Can AI Crypto Agents Do? The IMF notes that AI agents can initiate, coordinate and manage financial operations within the scope of their authorization. Payments […]

What Are the Top AI Crypto Agents Currently Available?

What are the top AI crypto agents currently available? There is no authoritative industry ranking, but based on official open-source repositories and protocol specifications, the leading projects fall into two groups. One is frameworks for building AI crypto agents, such as elizaOS, Coinbase AgentKit, Solana Agent Kit, Olas Open Autonomy and Fetch.ai uAgents. The other is protocols and standards that let agents make payments and establish trust, such as x402, AP2, ERC-8004 and ERC-6900. This article covers only what can be verified in official documentation and does not rank them. What Frameworks Are Used to Build AI Crypto Agents? elizaOS is an open-source TypeScript framework for autonomous AI agents. Its official wallet plugin supports EVM and Solana signing, x402 micropayments and on-chain spending policies, and requires all write operations involving funds to be confirmed at runtime. Coinbase AgentKit is a toolkit from the Coinbase Developer Platform that equips AI agents with crypto wallets and on-chain interaction capabilities. It is designed to be agnostic to specific agent frameworks and wallets, and its officially listed networks include Base, Ethereum and Solana. Solana Agent Kit, maintained by SendAI, is an open-source toolkit for connecting AI agents to Solana protocols. Olas Open Autonomy is a framework maintained by Valory for creating AI agents that run off-chain as multi-agent systems and provide functionality on-chain. Fetch.ai […]

What Are Agentic Payments?

What are agentic payments? They are payments initiated and completed autonomously by AI agents within the scope authorized by a user or business. In the words of Fed Governor Christopher Waller, the buyer delegates shopping and payment authority to an AI agent, which completes the transaction on their behalf. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) describes this change as a shift from “a human clicking to pay” to payments in which agents take part in decision-making. How Are Agentic Payments Different from Ordinary Online Payments? The difference lies in how authorization works. The IMF notes that traditional payment systems tie authorization directly to explicit instructions from a user or institution, whereas in agentic payments the agent operates under delegated authority. A single transaction may not correspond to a specific transaction instruction; instead, the user expresses goals and constraints. To make this kind of authorization verifiable, Google’s Agent Payments Protocol (AP2) introduces the Mandate: a cryptographically signed, tamper-proof digital contract that serves as proof of the user’s instructions. Within it, the Intent Mandate sets conditions such as price limits and timing, while the Cart Mandate records the exact items and prices. Bank of England Deputy Governor Sarah Breeden has also noted that most agents are still in “recommendation mode”, with humans executing the transactions, but that requiring humans to review every action […]

View More