Keep Your Funds
Safe From Here On

Safeheron offers enterprise-grade digital asset self-custody services and MPC privatization solutions, ensuring the highest level of security for your assets.

Secure, Efficient, Scalable

Top-tier, battle-tested security solutions for 260+ institutions since 2021.

$13M+

RAISED

$1.5B+

PEAK AUC

$300B+

SECURELY TRANSFERRED

Committed to the highest standards of security and compliance.

Certified and Insured

Partner with Top Security and Compliance Partners

Compliance in Action

Explore Our Trust Center

MPC Self-Custody

Enterprise-grade digital asset self-custody services

Eliminate single-point failures to manage digital assets

  • MPC and TEE technologies protect your digital assets with the highest level of security.
  • Manage wallets and transfer funds on multiple terminals, including the mobile App and Web Console.
  • Policy Engine flexibly controls access authorization.
  • Off-chain multisignature enhances approval privacy and significantly reduces on-chain transaction fees.
View More
Eliminate single-point failures to manage digital assets
Talk to Us

MPC Node Suite

White-label MPC privatization solutions

Flexibly build MPC wallets for seamless integration into your applications

  • Fully privatized, with hardware-level data security and privacy protection under your control.
  • A secure, universal, and cross-platform MPC-TSS key management solution.
  • Support diverse business scenarios to accelerate your success.
View More
Flexibly build MPC wallets for seamless integration into your applications
Talk to Us

Safest software is
open source

Safeheron independently developed MPC algorithms and is now the world's first company to open-source the mainstream MPC-TSS algorithm in C++.

Hear from our customers

Safeheron empowers financial institutions with secure key sharding, flexible and customizable wallet governance, and efficient, seamless approval workflows, letting institutions enjoy powerful self-custody services effortlessly.

Li Liang, Singapore CEO View More

Our partnership with Safeheron has unlocked new possibilities in digital payment through advanced MPC and TEE technology. This collaboration strengthens our security, scalability, and compliance, enabling us to meet the highest standards. With Safeheron’s powerful MPC self-custody solution, dtcpay continues to provide our users with institutional-grade security, seamless transactions, and an intuitive user experience, reinforcing our commitment to advancing the future of digital payments.

Sam Lin, CTO View More

As a trusted financial service provider, we have strict standards when choosing our security infrastructure provider. Safeheron turns out to be a great match. Its MPC self-custody solution eliminates private key risks while providing enterprise-grade security with ease of use. With Safeheron’s sophisticated technology, we are confident to provide our customers with a reliable and secure digital payment experience.

Louis Liu, Founder & CEO

The Safeheron team has in-depth expertise and extensive practical experience in blockchain security. With a highly robust security mechanism, a comprehensive permission management system, and an excellent user experience, Safeheron has provided strong support for our institutional trading services in the Asia region. We look forward to further deepening our collaboration.

Hao Chen, CEO View More

UXUY has developed a highly secure key management service powered by Safeheron's MPC technology. In today's challenging cyber environment where digital assets face numerous security threats, Safeheron's mature solution provides us with robust technical assurance. Through this innovative MPC solution, we have effectively reduced the risks of private key leakage and asset theft, delivering users a seamless experience that combines both security and convenience.

Max, CTO

With Safeheron’s hardcore MPC technology, we ensure the highest level of security for our clients' crypto funds within our crypto-to-fiat feature. In addition, Safeheron's customer support exemplifies excellence, promptly resolving issues to maintain our uninterrupted operations.

Jean-Baptiste Chenut, CFO View More

Partnering with Safeheron has been transformative for AlphaYield. Their MPC + TEE platform delivers the enterprise-grade security and operational efficiency we need to execute large institutional trades with complete confidence, while their exceptional team consistently goes above and beyond to support our evolving needs.

Michael Pearson, CEO View More

Security, flexibility, and compliance — all solved on one platform. Since integrating Safeheron, our business volume has tripled.

Christian Li, CEO View More

Latest Updates from Safeheron

Controlling How Funds Move
Industry Insights

Beyond Key Security: Controlling How Funds Move

At 18:31 UTC on September 24, two small transfers left Bitget’s hot wallets: 0.184 ETH and 193 TRX. According to CEO Gracy Chen, both were below the exchange’s risk-control threshold and neither triggered an alert. Approximately 30 minutes later, the large transfers began. Bitget’s final figure is roughly US$388 million, all of it from hot and warm wallets. No private key was stolen. Bitget says the attacker exploited a zero-day vulnerability in a third-party security product, reached its internal management systems, used high-privilege credentials to access wallet-related backend servers, and wrote forged withdrawal commands directly into the wallet system. Those commands bypassed risk-control checks and were processed as legitimate. Cold wallets were unaffected. About two weeks later, Ledger began investigating hardware wallets sold through CryptoBilis, a Malaysia-based reseller. Some of the devices contained an implant that read the 24-word recovery phrase from the screen during setup and sent it out over a mobile network. The implant did not modify the Secure Element or the operating system, so Ledger’s standard integrity checks could not detect it. On-chain investigators estimate losses of US86 million to US93 million; Ledger has not confirmed a total and says its chip, operating system and servers were not compromised. The two attacks had little in common technically. What they share is that neither one broke the cryptography […]

By Safeheron Team 28/10/2026

Web3 Learning

What Is Finality in Blockchain?

What is finality in blockchain? It is the state in which a transaction written into a block can no longer be reversed or altered. Some chains offer probabilistic finality: the more confirmations, the less likely a transaction is to be reversed, though in theory the chance never reaches zero. Others offer deterministic finality: once a block is finalized, it cannot be undone without paying an extremely high cost. When a business decides whether a deposit can be credited, it is essentially judging whether the transaction is close enough to final. What Is the Difference Between Probabilistic and Deterministic Finality? Proof-of-work chains like Bitcoin have probabilistic finality. Each additional block added after the one containing a transaction increases the hash power needed to rewrite it, so the probability of reversal drops quickly as confirmations grow. Six confirmations is a common industry reference for large Bitcoin transfers. Chains built on BFT consensus, such as Cosmos ecosystem chains using CometBFT (formerly Tendermint), have deterministic finality: a block is finalized once it collects signatures from enough validators, and conventional reorgs do not occur. How Does Finality Work on Ethereum? Since moving to proof of stake, Ethereum sets checkpoints by epoch. Each epoch has 32 slots of 12 seconds each. A checkpoint becomes justified once validators representing more than two-thirds of the stake vote for […]

By Safeheron Team 28/10/2026

What Is Double Spending in Crypto?

What is double spending in crypto? It means the same digital asset is spent twice. Blockchains use network-wide consensus to ensure each unit of funds can be spent only once on the ledger, so double spending cannot happen on a single finalized chain. What an attacker can do is get a recipient to see and accept a payment, then make that payment invalid and spend the same coins elsewhere. For businesses, double-spending risk almost always arises when deposits are credited without enough confirmations. How Do Blockchains Prevent Double Spending? Before including a transaction, nodes check whether its funds have already been spent. On UTXO-based chains like Bitcoin, each unspent output can be spent by only one transaction; on account-based chains like Ethereum, each address’s nonce ensures a transaction with a given sequence number executes only once. Of two conflicting transactions, only one will ultimately be written to the chain. The problem is that until a transaction is included and receives enough confirmations, which one wins is not yet settled. What Are the Common Types of Double-Spending Attacks? The simplest is a race attack at zero confirmations: the attacker broadcasts two transactions spending the same coins almost simultaneously, one to a merchant and one back to themselves. If the merchant ships goods while the transaction is still in the mempool and […]

Can Tether Freeze USDT?

Can Tether freeze USDT? Yes. USDT is a centrally issued stablecoin, and Tether retains administrative control over the USDT smart contracts, including the ability to add addresses to a blacklist. A blacklisted address can no longer send USDT. Centralized stablecoins are designed this way so they can work with regulators and law enforcement, which makes them fundamentally different from assets like Bitcoin and ETH that have no issuer and cannot be frozen by anyone. How Does the USDT Freeze Function Work? On every chain, USDT is a smart contract that records the balance of each address. On Ethereum, for example, the USDT contract maintains a blacklist, and only an administrator address controlled by Tether can add or remove addresses. Whenever someone sends USDT, the contract first checks whether the sender is on the blacklist, and if so, the transaction fails. The contract also includes a function to destroy the balance of a frozen address. All of these actions are public on-chain transactions, so anyone can check on a block explorer whether an address has been frozen. USDT on Tron and other major chains has a similar mechanism, and USDT on different chains is frozen independently on each chain. Which Stablecoins Can Be Frozen? Not just USDT. Most centralized stablecoins issued by companies and fully backed by fiat or equivalent assets […]

What Should You Do If Your USDT Is Frozen?

What should you do if your USDT is frozen? First confirm that the address has actually been blacklisted by Tether, rather than failing for another reason such as insufficient fees. Once confirmed, the only way forward is to contact Tether and provide evidence that the funds came from a legitimate source, with no guarantee of whether or when they will be released. For businesses, prevention matters more: screen the source of funds before accepting them, and isolate risky funds in separate addresses. Why Does USDT Get Frozen? USDT is a centralized stablecoin issued by Tether, and its smart contract has a built-in blacklist, on both Ethereum and Tron. Once an address is blacklisted, the USDT in it cannot be moved. Common reasons for a freeze include law enforcement requests to freeze addresses linked to fraud, money laundering and similar cases, addresses appearing on sanctions lists, and addresses that received funds stolen in hacks. For most businesses, the risk is less about what they themselves did and more about receiving funds from a risky address: at best they may be asked to assist an investigation, and at worst their own address may be frozen too. How Can You Tell Whether Your USDT Is Frozen? When a frozen address tries to send USDT, the transaction fails during contract execution. But a failed […]

ERC-20 vs TRC-20 USDT: What’s the Difference?

ERC-20 vs TRC-20 USDT: what’s the difference? Both are USDT issued by Tether, but one runs on Ethereum and the other on Tron, and they are separate assets that cannot move between the two chains directly. The main differences are fees, speed and address format: ERC-20 USDT pays fees in ETH and uses addresses starting with 0x, while TRC-20 USDT pays fees in energy or TRX, is usually cheaper and faster, and uses addresses starting with T. The sender and the recipient must always use the same chain. How Do Fees Differ Between ERC-20 and TRC-20 USDT? Sending USDT on Ethereum requires ETH for gas, and the fee fluctuates with network congestion, sometimes rising sharply when the network is busy. Sending USDT on Tron mainly consumes energy and bandwidth, which can be obtained by staking TRX, with TRX burned only when they run short, so the cost per transfer is usually lower. That is one reason TRC-20 USDT is widely used for small, frequent payments. On either chain, the wallet must hold the native token, or USDT cannot be sent at all. How Do Speed and Address Formats Differ? Ethereum produces a block roughly every 12 seconds and Tron roughly every 3 seconds, so TRC-20 USDT is usually included faster. But being included is not the same as being safe […]

How Should Businesses Monitor On-Chain Transaction Status?

How should businesses monitor on-chain transaction status? From sending to final settlement, a transaction goes through several stages: signed, broadcast, waiting in the mempool, included in a block, and reaching enough confirmations. Along the way it can also fail, be replaced or be dropped. Businesses need to track these states for every transaction, set confirmation standards per chain, alert promptly on long-unconfirmed transactions, failed executions, unexpected replacements and chain reorganizations, and update business systems based on final status. What States Can an On-Chain Transaction Be In? After signing, a transaction is broadcast to the network and queues in nodes’ mempools. Once included in a block it has its first confirmation, and each additional block adds another; it is only truly complete after reaching the required number of confirmations or the chain’s finality standard. Abnormal cases include failed broadcasts, transactions that go unincluded for a long time, transactions replaced by another one using the same nonce or the same UTXOs, and transactions dropped from the mempool. On EVM chains, note that inclusion does not mean success: a transaction whose contract execution fails is still recorded on-chain and still pays gas, so check the execution result in the receipt. How Many Confirmations Does Each Chain Need? The more confirmations, the less likely a transaction is to be rolled back by a chain […]

View More