Web3 Learning

MPC vs Multisig Wallets

By Safeheron Team - 2024-02-27

In the realm of blockchain and cryptocurrency security, Multi-Party Computation (MPC) wallets and Multisignature (Multisig) wallets stand out as critical technologies for protecting digital assets. These two security solutions, each with its unique benefits and limitations, play a pivotal role in how individuals and institutions secure their cryptocurrencies.

By delving into the specifics of MPC and Multisig wallets, you can better navigate the complexities of digital asset security, making informed decisions that align with their security needs and the nature of their crypto holdings.

Multisig Wallets: A Primer

Multisig (multi-signature) wallets are a cornerstone of digital asset security, offering a collaborative approach to safeguarding cryptocurrencies. Rooted in the principle of requiring multiple parties to approve a transaction before it can be executed, multisig wallets add an essential layer of security that surpasses the traditional single-signature wallets.

How Multisig Wallets Work

  • Multiple Keyholders: Unlike single-key wallets, which are secured by a single private key, multisig wallets require two or more private keys to authorize a transaction. The wallet's setup can vary, commonly represented as "m-of-n," where "m" is the minimum number of signatures required to execute a transaction, and "n" is the total number of participants in the wallet.

  • Transaction Approval Process: To initiate a transaction, a participant proposes an action (e.g., sending cryptocurrency). For the transaction to proceed, a predefined number of additional participants must sign off, verifying their agreement with their unique private keys.

  • Decentralized Control: This setup decentralizes control over assets, mitigating the risk of a single point of failure. Even if one key is compromised, the digital assets remain secure, as unauthorized users cannot meet the threshold of required approvals.


  • Enhanced Security: By distributing the power to approve transactions among multiple parties, multisig wallets significantly reduce the risk of asset theft. Even if a malicious actor gains access to one private key, they cannot unilaterally move funds.
  • Transparency: Multisig wallets inherently support transparency and accountability. Each transaction requires consensus, creating a verifiable audit trail of who approved what and when.
  • Flexible Thresholds: Organizations can tailor the wallet's structure to fit their governance models. For instance, a company might set up a 3-of-5 wallet for its treasury, requiring any three of the five designated officers to approve expenditures.
  • Dispute Resolution: In scenarios where stakeholders disagree on a transaction, the multisig mechanism naturally provides a platform for discussion and resolution. Only transactions with collective approval are executed, ensuring that no single party can act against the interests of the group.


Complexity in Setup and Use

  • Technical Barrier: Setting up a multisig wallet can be technically challenging for those new to cryptocurrency and blockchain technology. The process requires a clear understanding of how digital wallets work, as well as the specific protocols of the multisig platform being used.
  • User Experience: The user experience of managing a multisig wallet can be cumbersome, especially for those accustomed to the simplicity of single-signature wallets. Initiating transactions requires coordination among participants, which can be time-consuming and inconvenient for urgent transactions.

Recovery Issues

  • Lost Keys: In a multisig setup, losing access to one or more keys can result in the inability to execute transactions, especially if the threshold for approvals is set high. This risk necessitates meticulous management of private keys by all participants.
  • Complicated Recovery Processes: Recovering access to a multisig wallet, should participants lose their keys, is significantly more complex than with traditional wallets. The recovery process may involve initiating a multisig recovery protocol, which could be both time-consuming and technically demanding.

Cost and Efficiency

  • Transaction Costs: Transactions from a multisig wallet can incur higher fees than those from single-signature wallets. This is because multisig transactions are more complex and require more data to be processed and stored on the blockchain.
  • Speed and Efficiency: The need for multiple approvals can delay transactions, making multisig wallets less efficient for time-sensitive operations. This is particularly challenging in fast-paced markets or situations where immediate asset transfer is critical.

Scalability and Flexibility

  • Scalability Concerns: As the number of participants in a multisig wallet increases, coordinating transactions becomes increasingly challenging. This can limit the scalability of multisig solutions, especially for large organizations with many stakeholders.
  • Flexibility Limitations: While the security model of multisig wallets is robust, it can sometimes be too rigid for dynamic environments. Adjusting the configuration (e.g., changing the number of required approvals) can be cumbersome and may require setting up a new wallet.

Use Cases

  • Corporate Governance: Corporations use multisig wallets to manage company funds, ensuring that no single individual has unilateral control over financial decisions.
  • Estate Planning: Individuals can set up multisig wallets for estate planning, requiring multiple family members to agree on asset distribution.
  • Collaborative Projects: Project teams managing joint funds (e.g., in DAOs, Decentralized Autonomous Organizations) leverage multisig for transparent and democratic fund management.

MPC Wallets: A New Frontier

Secure Multi-Party Computation (MPC) wallets represent an innovative leap forward in the secure management of digital assets. By utilizing cryptographic protocols that distribute the generation and storage of private keys, MPC wallets allow for transactions to be approved and executed without needing a single entity to possess the complete private key at any point.

This sophisticated technology affords several substantial benefits to users seeking the next level of security in their digital asset management.

How MPC Wallets Work

  • Distributed Key Generation: An MPC wallet generates multiple key shares, distributing them among different parties. No single party ever has access to the entire key, mitigating the risk of total key compromise.

  • Collaborative Transaction Signing: To execute a transaction, a subset of participants must come together and use their key shares. The MPC protocol allows these shares to collaboratively sign a transaction without reconstructing the private key.

  • Continuous Security: MPC protocols can continuously refresh and redistribute key shares without changing the public key or wallet address. This process, known as key resharing, enhances security by reducing the time window in which a key share could be compromised.


  • Enhanced Privacy and Security: Since private keys are never fully assembled in an MPC wallet, they are less susceptible to theft. The distributed trust model also means that a breach of one node does not compromise the entire wallet.
  • Simplified Key Management: MPC eliminates the need for complex key custody arrangements and reduces the reliance on physical security measures typically required to protect a private key.
  • Operational Flexibility: MPC wallets can be designed to adapt to various governance structures, allowing the configuration of rules that fit diverse operational needs without compromising security.
  • Scalable Security for Institutions: The scalability of MPC makes it an attractive option for institutions that require a secure and efficient way to manage a large number of transactions and assets across different accounts and blockchains.


  • Technical Complexity: Implementing and maintaining MPC systems requires advanced knowledge, potentially limiting accessibility to individuals.
  • Emerging Technology: As a relatively new field, the long-term reliability and potential vulnerabilities of MPC are not as well-documented as more established methods.

Use Cases

  • Institutional Asset Management: Financial institutions leveraging MPC wallets can enhance their client offerings with high-security digital asset management services.
  • Cross-Border Transactions: Businesses that regularly conduct cross-border payments can benefit from the robust security and efficiency of MPC wallets to reduce the risk of fraud and errors.
  • Collaborative Control of Assets: Just like multisig wallets, MPC can be used in scenarios where multiple stakeholders must agree on the use of funds, but with the added security and privacy benefits of distributed key generation.

Challenges For Multisig Wallets

Multisig wallets, while beneficial for their enhanced security and shared control features, encounter several operational and technical challenges:

Operational Delays and Coordination

Multisig wallets require multiple signatures, leading to delays and coordination challenges among parties.

MPC wallets facilitate a smoother transaction process by allowing parties to compute their part of the transaction independently and simultaneously. This asynchronous nature significantly reduces coordination issues and operational delays.

User Experience and Accessibility

The complexity of managing multisig wallets can deter less technical users.

Although MPC wallets involve complex cryptographic operations, these processes are typically abstracted away by wallet providers, offering users a more straightforward interface. This abstraction improves user experience and accessibility, making advanced security more approachable for a wider audience.

Key Management and Recovery

Losing one of the keys in a multisig setup can complicate access and recovery processes.

In MPC-based solutions, a single private key is never constructed in a single location to begin with, and parts of the secret are distributed among participants. This distribution can facilitate more robust and flexible key recovery mechanisms, reducing the risks associated with lost or compromised keys.

Smart Contract Vulnerability

Many multisig wallets rely on smart contracts that are vulnerable to exploits if not written securely.

Since MPC wallets does not inherently rely on smart contracts for the execution of transactions, it is not exposed to smart contract vulnerabilities in the same way. The cryptographic operations occur off-chain, mitigating the risk associated with on-chain smart contract exploits.

Costs and Scalability Issues

Multisig transactions can incur higher fees and face scalability issues due to the need for multiple transactions/signatures on the blockchain.

MPC reduces the need for multiple blockchain transactions for a single operation. Since the computation is done off-chain and the final transaction can be submitted as a single transaction, it can significantly lower transaction fees and mitigate scalability issues.

Legal and Compliance Hurdles

The multisig architecture can complicate compliance with AML and KYC regulations due to multiple parties' involvement.

MPC offers flexibility in designing compliance and governance models by allowing for cryptographic proof of compliance without revealing the underlying data. This can simplify regulatory adherence while ensuring privacy and security, offering a balance between regulatory compliance and operational efficiency.

MPC Wallets vs. Multisig Wallets: A Detailed Comparison

When delving deeper into the comparison between MPC and multisig wallets, the distinctions between the two become more pronounced:

Key Management and Security Procedures

  • MPC wallets eliminate the need for key holders to manage individual keys, instead using cryptographic algorithms to distribute trust without revealing any single key completely. This can reduce the risk of key mismanagement or loss.
  • Multisig wallets, while still secure, can be more vulnerable to key management issues since each key holder must securely manage their own private keys.

Adaptability to Regulatory Changes

  • MPC technology is often seen as more adaptable to regulatory changes. It can provide auditable and compliant solutions while maintaining the security and privacy of the key management process.
  • Multisig setups can run into difficulties with evolving regulations, as changes may require significant adjustments to the multisig scheme or even re-creation of the wallet, both of which can be cumbersome.

Implementation Complexity

  • MPC solutions, being a newer technology, carry a steeper learning curve and require more sophisticated understanding and implementation, which might limit their use to more tech-savvy organizations or individuals.
  • Multisig wallets are relatively simpler to set up and use, with many cryptocurrency exchanges and wallet services offering user-friendly interfaces for creating and managing multisig wallets.

Performance and Efficiency

  • MPC wallets may offer increased efficiency for organizations that need to process transactions quickly and seamlessly, as they do not require the sequential gathering of multiple signatures.
  • Multisig can be less efficient due to the need for multiple parties to coordinate and sign off on transactions, which can be time-consuming, especially if the signatories are spread across different locations.

Cost Efficiency

  • While implementation costs for MPC might be higher initially due to the complexity, the transaction costs can be lower in the long run because it does not require multiple transactions for multiple signatures on the blockchain.
  • Multisig wallets might have lower setup costs but can incur higher transaction fees, particularly on congested networks where each signature is a separate transaction.

Flexibility and Control

  • MPC provides a higher degree of flexibility and can be more suited for dynamic environments where transaction patterns or security requirements change frequently.
  • Multisig offers a more controlled environment, which can be advantageous in scenarios where strict corporate governance and clear operational procedures need to be followed.

Safeheron MPC Wallet

In the evolving digital asset landscape, the Safeheron MPC Wallet emerges as a solution focused on security, efficiency, and adaptability. Designed to meet the needs of both institutional and individual users, it integrates innovative technology with practical design considerations, contributing to the field of digital asset management.

Comprehensive Security Architecture: MPC + TEE

Safeheron MPC Wallet employs a comprehensive security architecture that combines Secure Multi-Party Computation (MPC) with Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) technology. This dual-layered approach ensures decentralized management of private key shards and protects the entire transaction process from potential security breaches. The integration of TEE provides an additional safeguard, ensuring that each step within the MPC process is executed securely and reliably. This combination offers an advanced level of security, pivotal in today’s digital asset management.

Flexible and Adaptable Policy Engine

The wallet's policy engine offers a high degree of adaptability, enabling customers to control asset flow with granular precision. Through this engine, users can configure and customize governance and operational procedures, ensuring that asset management aligns with specific needs and compliance requirements. This flexibility empowers users to tailor the wallet's functionality to their unique operational contexts, ensuring both security and ease of asset management.

Integrated Compliance: AML and KYT

Safeheron MPC Wallet places a strong emphasis on compliance, integrating robust Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Know Your Transaction (KYT) frameworks. This integrated approach ensures adherence to regulatory standards and helps prevent illicit financial activities.

  • AML (Anti-Money Laundering): The wallet's AML system is designed to monitor and report suspicious activities. It employs advanced algorithms to analyze transaction patterns, flagging any transactions that may indicate money laundering or other illegal activities.
  • KYT (Know Your Transaction): Complementing AML, the KYT component provides detailed insights into the nature of transactions. It helps identify the parties involved in transactions and assesses their risk profiles, ensuring a thorough vetting process that aligns with compliance requirements.

Certified, Audited, Insured

Safeheron MPC Wallet adheres to rigorous compliance standards, holding ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type I and Type II certifications and benefiting from Lockton insurance protection. Regular security audits and penetration tests by SlowMist, combined with ongoing in-house development and audits of MPC algorithms and product codes, further reinforce the wallet's compliance posture. Esteemed firms such as Kudelski Security, Least Authority, and Cure53 have audited various aspects of Safeheron's technology, ensuring a consistently high standard of security and reliability.

Robust Customer Support

Safeheron MPC Wallet provides comprehensive customer support to ensure a seamless user experience. The support system is designed to assist users at every step, from initial setup to regular use, ensuring that clients can efficiently and confidently utilize the Safeheron wallet. This all-encompassing customer support is crucial for enabling users of all technical backgrounds to access and manage their digital assets effectively.


The choice between MPC and multisig wallets depends on a variety of factors, including the specific security needs, operational complexity, and the technical expertise of the users. While multisig wallets offer a more traditional, time-tested approach to security, MPC wallets break new ground in terms of efficiency and the distribution of trust.

As digital assets continue to grow in importance and value, the technologies we use to secure them must evolve concurrently. Both multisig and MPC wallets represent significant advancements in digital asset security, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. Ultimately, the decision on which to use should be informed by a thorough assessment of the user's specific needs, the value of the assets in question, and the potential risks involved.

In navigating these choices, stakeholders must remain vigilant and informed about the latest developments in digital asset security, ensuring that their decisions are based on the most current and comprehensive information available. As the blockchain landscape continues to evolve, so too will the technologies and strategies we employ to protect our digital treasures.